HMRC wins big in “tax on gifts” case
Bernie Ecclestone’s lawyer faces a massive tax bill following the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT’s) ruling that sums he received as gifts were income. What made the FTT decide the payments were taxable?
Over a period of 14 years Bernie Ecclestone’s former wife, Slavica, made payments totalling around £37 million to Stephen Mullens, Ecclestone’s lawyer. He claimed these gifts resulted from their "personal relationship of friendship and affection" and that they were wholly outside and distinct from any business relationship. Despite hearing evidence of Mrs Ecclestone’s generosity and a document purporting to be a deed of gift relating to a payment in 2006, the FTT considered all the payments, apart from one, were actually a reward for professional services provided by Mullens.
It is possible for a payment to be a gift, and so not taxable as income, even where a business relationship exists between the payer and the recipient, but the burden of proof is high. Mullen’s case was hindered because neither Bernie Ecclestone nor his former wife gave evidence. The FTT judges said they had no hesitation in deciding that Mullens had acted fraudulently in not declaring the payments and then representing them as gifts.
The FTT also ruled that because of Mullen’s deliberate action to hide the payments HMRC was entitled to make back-assessments under the rules of discovery. These give HMRC more time (up to 20 years) in cases of tax lost because of fraud compared with that lost from carelessness.
Related Topics
-
Directors to face identity checks under Companies House reforms
Companies House has published further guidance on the introduction of mandatory identity verification for company directors and other individuals involved in company filings. The change forms part of the reforms introduced by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023. What do you need to know?
-
Review how much VAT charged on sales?
A recent Tribunal case ruled that HMRC’s logic was flawed in dealing with a “what is the supply” challenge. Does this mean you should check that you are charging VAT correctly on your sales if there could be doubt about what you are selling?
-
Are buy-to-let companies worth the hype?
There’s no doubt that landlords have been on the receiving end of multiple tax hikes in recent years. So called “property experts” will tell you that the best tax-saving strategy is to operate through a company. Are they right?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.