Man Utd is cutting staff perks. Should, and can, you?
Manchester United FC is to end free hot meals for its staff as part of a cost-cutting exercise. If you want to withdraw staff perks such as free food, tea and coffee to save on business costs, can you do so?

If any of the perks are contractual entitlements, then you will only be able to withdraw them with explicit employee consent. Otherwise, without consent, you will be in breach of contract. Check the terms of employment contracts and staff handbooks carefully. If any perks are contractual, seek employee consent through a process of consultation and negotiation. Employees are likely to be more understanding and give their consent if they see your proposal as necessary for business survival or job security. A compromise here might be to reduce perk frequency, or to replace them with lower-cost alternatives, rather than removing them altogether.
If the perks are not a contractual right but rather you provide them entirely on a discretionary basis, which is likely to be the case at least with free tea and coffee, you should be able to withdraw them without consent. However, as staff may have come to rely on these perks, to avoid breaching the implied term of trust and confidence and to preserve good employee relations, it’s advisable to still consult with staff about your proposals, being honest about the business reasons why you need to cut costs, how you are hoping to achieve this and when your proposal will be implemented, giving adequate notice of the change.
Also be aware that, depending on the circumstances, a discretionary benefit can harden into a contractual entitlement, through custom and practice, if it has been provided consistently over time. So, even if a perk is discretionary, it may now, in fact, have become part of the employee’s terms and conditions of employment.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?